The rights of women have been changing for decades, but their roles in a family have not. As time has gone on, women have gained rates in government ,the work force, and daily life. But the responsibilities one has at home has not changed. One huge change in rights for women was the choice to join the armed forces. So is there a choice to be made? Is it black and white? If you want to serve in the armed forces as a woman, having a family is not an option? But what if your pregnancy is a surprise? Or you’ve been off duty for two years and all of the sudden get a deployment notice with a 1 year-old at home. It’s a sticky situation that I was able to get some answers on.
Women have been involved in some way with every war in history, but their occupations have taken a turn. Currently, I’m reading, “Testament of Youth” an autobiography by Vera Brittain. Taking place in World War I, Vera becomes involved in the nursing side of the war. Having a loved one, and family member in a war can encourage someone, man or woman to get as involved as they can. Making them feel supportive, and in a way, closer to that loved one. Vera states in a response to a letter from her parents,
Nothing – beyond sheer necessity – would induce me to stop doing what I am doing now, and I should never respect myself again if I allowed a few slight physical hardships to make me give up what is the finest work any girl can do now. I honestly did not take it up because I thought you did not want me or could not afford to give me a comfortable home, but because I wanted to prove I could more or less keep myself working, and partly because, not being a man and able to go to the front, I wanted to do the next best thing.
Although Vera is not a mother at this time, it shows the clear difference in the rights and expectations brought onto a women during that era vs. today. But now, this day in age, women are able to “go to the front” and fight in our wars. Something that didn’t need to be compromised during WWI for women was the care of their children. It was always the father who was off fighting and mom was at home with the kids, raising the family. In the present, mothers could be forced to leave their children at home to fight for our country, but the debate being, Are they obliged to do this even if they have children and disagree with the task at hand. In the episode ‘For Family, For Country’ Military Moms Do It All on NPR, three military moms were interviewed on how they balanced work and family, and also their thoughts on military mom, Lisa Pegan, who got out of returning to fight after fighting the fact that she now had two children and couldn’t return to the forces. Petty officer Pilar Arteaga stated that she thought “Lisa Pegan’s decision brought women in the armed forces down a peg. And that being a woman in the armed forces, you find yourself proving yourself a lot more.” Arteaga is a single mom who has had to leave her son with friends and family on numerous occasions because of deployments. All of the mothers in the interview continued to work in the armed forces until they were able to retire, while raising children. And all believe that it can and needs to be done by all women across the board.
But the debate still runs, should women be obliged to fight or not? Especially if the government isn’t going to provide caregivers for the children if the woman doesn’t have any. Is it really that simple?
NPR 2009
Tell Me More
“For Family, For Country’ Military Moms Do It All